Click or tap "Get Started" above to move through these pages in order — or use the buttons below in the order you choose.
= Page includes questions or opportunities for comment.
This project is also bringing a new library to Gladstone. Click below to visit the online open house for the Gladstone Library:
Visit the Gladstone Library
Online Open House
Clackamas County is committed to building the Oak Lodge and Gladstone Community Project with construction estimated to start in winter 2022.
Over the last eight months, the design team drafted design alternatives for your review after listening to community feedback and working with the Concord Property and Library Planning Task Force. Today you can find out more, see the top three design alternatives and share your ideas.
October 2017: As part of an agreement with the City of Gladstone, Clackamas County will build and operate one library at the previous Gladstone City Hall site, and another within the Oak Lodge library service area.
March 2018: As part of a strategic partnership with the North Clackamas School District, the North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District (NCPRD) took ownership of Concord Elementary School in Oak Grove to:
The current libraries in Gladstone and Oak Lodge are in poor condition, do not meet structural or ADA standards, and do not meet community needs.
The project team has been working on a master plan for the library, which includes incorporating community feedback into a preferred design. Here’s what’s been happening, and where we’re headed next:
Previous community discussions identified the Concord Property as a possible location for a new Oak Lodge Library.
Dive deeper into the design alternatives analysis:
From fall 2019 through January 2020, Clackamas County and NCPRD reached out to the community through a survey (both online and on paper), an open house and focus groups.
We heard that these are the most important things to consider for the Concord Property’s park and community center, and for the Oak Lodge Library:
Read more about the previous round of outreach.
In early 2020, the design team hosted a design workshop for the Concord Property. Community members gave input on possible design solutions for the community center, park and library. The team used that input to draft the design alternatives you’ll see today. See how they did it in the video above.
The Concord Property and Library Planning Task Force meets regularly to guide planning and give recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. Read more about the task force.
Read more about the task force.
The task force established values based on what its members felt are most important for the Oak Grove and Jennings Lodge communities. These community values became the criteria used to evaluate the draft design alternatives. We’re using these criteria to ask you about the design alternatives.
After review and discussion by the Task Force, the three draft alternatives that seem to best meet the criteria were chosen to present to the public for review and comment. These are intended to guide a final concept — which means they show the important parts, but not a lot of detail. (That will come later.) Today you can learn more about each of these design alternatives, then give your thoughts and feedback.
The Concord Property and Library Planning Task Force has reviewed these design alternatives. You’ll see more about the task force discussion and preferences as you move through each alternative.
The criteria help differentiate between the three design alternatives. Click through the tabs and tell us which features make the most sense to you.
Some design criteria, listed below, will be important only in later stages. We’ll evaluate them later, but not today.
The design team also produced design options that the task force agreed are not feasible to explore further. Learn more about these designs and view images of Option 1A (PDF, 870 KB), Option 4 (PDF, 709 KB), and Options 5A and 5B (PDF, 813 KB).
Includes civic and community gathering spaces (meeting rooms, gym, plaza, etc.) and activities; will continue to be welcoming in the future.
Balances needs for library, gym, indoor spaces, park spaces, office spaces and community center space; uses shared space appropriately for different uses.
Includes spaces and facilities to allow for a positive experience for library patrons and staff.
Includes spaces and facilities to allow for positive experiences for community members and staff.
Allows for equitable access to all public facilities and programs by people with diverse physical and mental abilities, and various backgrounds and interests.
Offers outdoor recreation, play and nature opportunities; makes good use of available green spaces.
Includes spaces for display of art and performance, art education.
Development Cost
Value to Community
Efficient Operations
Development Cost
Value to Community
Efficient Operations
Development Cost
Value to Community
Efficient Operations
Within budget; good value for the money; provides for cost-efficient operations.
Criteria | Option 1 | Option 2 * | Option 3 |
---|---|---|---|
A. Provides a welcoming and inclusive community heart for generations to come. | |||
B. Supports multiple functions and communities. | |||
C. Supports library activities. | |||
D. Supports community center / recreation activities. | |||
E. Provides diverse, inclusive and culturally-informed accessibility and access to services. | |||
F. Provides stewardship of park, natural and available open spaces. | |||
G. Incorporates opportunities for art and creative expression. | |||
H. Reflects conscientious stewardship of funding. |
= Fully meets = Partially Meets = Does not meet = Not sure
* Task Force preliminary endorsement. Learn more.
Before you leave, be sure to submit any comments you've provided. (The option to review and submit answers will appear after you answer at least one question.)