This site may be easier to use if viewed in the "landscape" orientation.
 

Work Session Open House 3

The Independent Cover Team (ICA) is charged with engaging the community in a visioning and evaluation process to identify alternative designs for the highway covers that more closely support the community’s vision for neighborhood revitalization and restorative justice for the Black Historic Albina community. The third online open house will solicit feedback from the community stakeholders about which cover design scenarios and elements most closely align with their vision and goals.

This site is currently closed to new comments, however you can continue to follow the project and submit comments though the project website.

Visit the pages on this site using the buttons below or click "Get Started" to move through the information in order.

Stations

1
Consider the meaning and purpose of Work Session 3. 
2
Learn about the feedback we have received so far. 
3
Evaluate the 3 design scenarios, 3 hybrid scenarios, and the most important design elements to include in a recommendation. 
4
Provide feedback on the proposed neighborhood framework and governance recommendations. 
5
Learn what happens next and tell us a little about yourself. 

= Page includes questions or opportunities for comment.

Black men playing basketball in an  outdoor active recreation area in Detroit, Michigan.


Last year, in response to direction from the Governor and requests from local project stakeholders, the Oregon Transportation Commission directed the Oregon Department of Transportation to retain a consultant team of local and national urban design, engineering, and environmental experts to conduct an independent assessment of the highway cover designs included in the I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project. The requests from Metro, Multnomah County, City of Portland, Portland Public Schools and Albina Vision Trust shaped the creation of the independent cover assessment process.

Project Understanding

The Independent Cover Assessment team is charged with engaging the community in a visioning and evaluation process to help identify alternative designs for the covers that will more closely align with the Black Historic Albina community’s vision and goals for the area.

Image gallery contents:

Vancouver Looking South: Existing

Vancouver Looking South: Future

Project Goals

The goal is to create 2-3 alternative designs for the highway covers which provide a canvas for future community redevelopment and provide restorative justice for the past harm done to the Black Historic Albina community in the 1960s when the I-5 freeway was built through the middle of the existing community, displacing hundreds of Black homes and businesses, and fragmenting the community.

Work Session 3

The goal of Work Session 3 is to provide recommendations to the Oregon Department of Transportation’s Executive Steering Committee that allow the Black Historic Albina community to maximize benefits and restorative justice from the highway covers and own and benefit from  the use of the land on and around the cover into the future.

Based on public feedback in Work Session 2, the Independent Cover Assessment Team has revised and conducted additional feasibility analyses on Preliminary Concept Scenarios 1,4, and 5.  The team has also developed 3 hybrid design options that can be considered to improve Concept 1’s responsiveness to the Black Historic Albina Community’s vision and desired outcomes.  In Work Session 3, participants will have the opportunity to evaluate these final design scenarios and options and provide feedback on the most important highway cover design elements, as well as indicate their support for preliminary neighborhood framework and Black community led governance structure recommendations to assess whether they should be part of a final cover scenario recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission.  

The goal and theme for Work Session 3 are:

Goal: Evaluate/Refine

Theme: “Identify the highway cover scenario, cover elements, and governance structure that community participants feel should be prioritized for inclusion in the Executive Steering Committee’s highway cover recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission to provide the greatest amount of community benefits and restorative justice for the Black Historic Albina community.”

Vancouver Looking South Across I-5 to Moda Center: Existing

Vancouver Looking South: Existing

Vancouver Looking South Across I-5 to Moda Center: Future

Vancouver Looking South: Future

(Click images to enlarge. Images courtesy of ZGF Architects.)

What We Learned

In Work Session 1 the Independent Cover Assessment team sought to understand the Black Historic Albina community’s vision about how highway covers could be used to support neighborhood revitalization and provide restorative justice for this area of the Central City.

In Work Session 2, participants provided feedback on preliminary concept scenarios that were developed in response to the community’s feedback from Work Session 1. They were also asked how community benefits could be maximized and should be delivered, through the provision of funding, through the provision of land, or with a combination of both.

Image gallery contents:

Workshop 2 Scenarios

Community participants ranked Concepts 4 (Cultural Center on the Grid) and 5 (Restore the Grid) as being the most responsive to the community’s vision and desired outcomes for community Wealth, Health, Cohesion and Mobility. They recommended these two concepts for continued study.

Workshop 2 Scenarios

Community participants ranked Concepts 4 (Cultural Center on the Grid) and 5 (Restore the Grid) as being the most responsive to the community’s vision and desired outcomes for community Wealth, Health, Cohesion and Mobility. They recommended these two concepts for continued study.

Summary of Feedback

There was broad agreement in the community workshops that:

  • This is a once in a generation opportunity to reclaim developable land in the Rose Quarter/Lower Albina neighborhood that the community can own and control.
  • Maximizing the land provided by the covers was the most important benefit that the Rose Quarter Improvement Project could provide to compensate for the harm done to the Black Historic Albina community during the freeway building.
  • Providing more quality developable land on and adjacent to the highway cover provides a unique opportunity for the Black community to reconstitute a cultural neighborhood in Northeast Portland with a Black ownership and governance structure to prevent gentrification and displacement.
Workshop 2 Scenarios|Community participants ranked Concepts 4 (Cultural Center on the Grid) and 5 (Restore the Grid) as being the most responsive to the community’s vision and desired outcomes for community Wealth, Health, Cohesion and Mobility. They recommended these two concepts for continued study.


Community participants ranked Concepts 4 (Cultural Center on the Grid) and 5 (Restore the Grid) as being the most responsive to the community’s vision and desired outcomes for community Wealth, Health, Cohesion and Mobility. They recommended these two concepts for continued study.

Maximizing Community Benefits

We asked Work Session 2 participants about what form restorative benefits should take and how community benefits should be maximized. Most participants indicated that their preference was to have land versus other types of funding and support. There were some participants who thought having both land and resources would be ideal. Some of the comments we heard from participants included:

“If you don't own it you don't have wealth creation."

“It’s all about land."

“I want black culture to be the thread that runs through every fabric of this endeavor."

"We want a project where Black people don't have to choose between Health or Wealth or mobility or cohesion. We deserve it all, if it's all on the table."

Restore what we had."

“(We want) legacy wealth … generation to generation."

“We want it all and it's just a small portion of what we deserve."

Governance

In Work Session 2 it became clear that creating a governance structure was going to be a critical component to any design scenario and the future efforts to reconstitute a neighborhood that supports the aspirations of Black Portlanders on land returned to community by this project. To provide the outcomes the Black community envisions, the entity entrusted with carrying this vision forward will need to be led, controlled, and managed by members of the Black community. It should hold the independent authority to negotiate legally binding ownership and operating agreements for the highway covers and remnant lands with the various public partners, as well as to form partnerships with other public stakeholders and Black community organizations in the region.

In the near-term, it’s proposed that this entity will be focused on ensuring that the covers are developed in a manner that creates long term community benefits that increase the wealth, health, and cohesion of the historically harmed Black Albina Community.

Cover Scenarios and Elements

Each final cover scenario shown is composed of a combination of design elements that are intended to make each cover scenario more responsive to the Black Historic Albina community and other stakeholders input and desired outcomes. Design elements presented in this online open house are used in the scenarios to improve the restorative justice performance of the Environmental Assessment (EA) Base Case and the Current Rose Quarter Improvement Project Design.

Review the Base Case and Current RQIP Design maps below. Then give us your feedback on the proposed Scenario and Hybrid options.


Environmental Assessment (EA) Base Case and Current Rose Quarter Improvement Project (RQIP) Design

Image gallery contents:

EA Base Case Scenario

Current RQIP Design

EA Base Case

EA Base Case Scenario

Click image to enlarge.

The Base Case is the concept ODOT had designed before the Independent Cover Assessment began. It creates a park and planted areas on the highway covers, improving the experience of crossing of I-5 and reducing exposure of nearby properties to noise and air pollution. The Base Case is provided for comparison and as a starting point for evaluating the alternate scenarios.

Current RQIP Design

Current RQIP Design

Click image to enlarge.

The Current Rose Quarter Improvement Project Design makes two modifications to the EA Base. It adds a continuous cover, and creates a new Hancock/Flint Connection to replace the old Hancock/Dixon Connection shown in the EA Base Case.

Scenario Analysis

As one considers the additional design elements that modify the cover scenarios more dramatically from the Current Rose Quarter Improvement Project Design, there is an increasing need for stakeholder support, coordination and collaboration to effectively manage the potential added risks to the project schedule and cost.

The Independent Cover Assessment team’s technical feasibility analysis to date has determined that there is a pathway whereby added risks can be effectively managed for all of the added design elements shown in revised Concepts 1, 4 and 5 and Hybrid options 1-3.  The recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission can include a role for government and private stakeholders to help manage the added risk to provide greater long-term value and benefits to the Black Historic Albina community in the form of quality developable cover land with strong street frontages, and a safer, more cohesive neighborhood environment.

Image gallery contents:

Flint/Broadway (Scenario 1)

Center on the Cover (Scenario 4)

Restore the Grid (Scenario 5)

Flint/Broadway (1)

Flint/Broadway (Scenario 1)

The revised Concept 1 modifies the Current Rose Quarter Improvement Project Design by adding two additional design elements. It adds cover structures for a portion of the southbound off-ramp and the northbound on-ramp (Element B), and it eliminates the Clackamas Pedestrian Bridge and reconfigures the Green Loop along the south side of Weidler (Element D).  It also reconnects Flint north across the cover.

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK:

Community
Wealth
Community
Health
Community
Cohesion
MobilitySchedule

COST ESTIMATE: $837,000,000 - $936,000,000

LAND: Less land (6.79 acres); more active streets for development; streets around new development are less pedestrian and business friendly when they hold I-5 traffic from ramps

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low, likely approved with limited EA Re-evaluation, least risk

Center on the Cover (4)

Center on the Cover (Scenario 4)

Concept 4 moves the southbound on and off ramps south of the cover (Element F) northbound on-ramp south of the cover and moves the northbound off-ramp further east, on the south side of the cover Element G).

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK:

Community
Wealth
Community
Health
Community
Cohesion
MobilitySchedule

COST ESTIMATE: $808,000,000 - $904,000,000

LAND: Creates most land on cover (8.96 acres); streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I 5 traffic

TRANSIT: Likely delay bus service on 4 and 44 Buses southbound

SCHEDULE DELAY: Moderate to high , likely 6-18 months, most complex process with more risk to completion

Restore the Grid (5)

Restore the Grid (Scenario 5)

The only difference between Concepts 4 and 5 is that in Concept 5 the Vancouver/Flint Connection (Element E) is removed and replaced with the Hancock/Flint Connection with Flint reconnected north (Element C) to reestablish the neighborhood street grid. This removes potential TriMet delays in southbound movement and maximizes street frontages.

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK:

Community
Wealth
Community
Health
Community
Cohesion
MobilitySchedule

COST ESTIMATE: $878,000,000-$983,000,000

LAND: Creates more land (8.21 acres) and more active streets for development; streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I-5 traffic

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE DELAY: Moderate to high, likely 6-18 months, most complex process with more risk to completion


Questions

Rank the three scenarios according to how well you think they maximize community benefits, provide restorative justice, and balance risks associated with schedule and cost.

Click and drag the options listed below into this box, then arrange by priority.
  • Concept 1 (Revised) - Flint / Broadway Boulevards Not ranked.
  • Concept 4 – Center on the Cover Not ranked.
  • Concept 5 – Restore the Grid Not ranked.

Hybrid Analysis

The project’s Executive Steering Committee may choose to compromise certain desired longer-term community benefits in their final cover design recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission to help manage the risks and deliver the other community benefits intended to be provided by the project during construction..

Help prioritize how ODOT and its stakeholders should proceed in incorporating additional design elements into the Current RQIP Design Scenario to improve upon its long-term restorative justice outcomes while maintaining the other economic benefits and opportunities of the Rose Quarter Improvement Project for the Black Historic Albina community.

Image gallery contents:

Hybrid 1

Hybrid 2

Hybrid 3

Hybrid 1

Hybrid 1

This hybrid option incorporates the Vancouver/Flint Connection (Element E), a design element from Concept 4, to replace the Hancock/Flint Connection (Element C) to open more developable land on the cover.

LAND: Creates more land on cover

TRANSIT: Likely delay bus service on 4 and 44 Buses southbound

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low, likely approved with limited EA Re- evaluation, least risk

Hybrid 2

Hybrid 2

This hybrid option moves the southbound on and off ramps south of the cover (Element F), a design element from Concepts 4 and 5.

LAND: Creates most land on cover; streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I-5 traffic

TRANSIT: Likely delay bus service on 4 and 44 Buses southbound

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low to moderate, likely 6-18 months, more complex process with slightly more risk to completion

Hybrid 3

Hybrid 3

This hybrid scenario restores the Hancock/Flint Connection (Element C) and reconnects Flint north across the cover while maintaining the movement of the southbound on and off ramps south of the cover (Element F).

LAND: Creates more active streets for development; streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I-5 traffic

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low to moderate, likely 6-18 months, more complex process with slightly more risk to completion


Questions

If Scenarios 4 and 5 are judged to have too much schedule or cost risk by the Executive Steering Committee, which of these hybrids do you prefer as an alternative option?

Click and drag the options listed below into this box, then arrange by priority.
  • Hybrid 1 Not ranked.
  • Hybrid 2 Not ranked.
  • Hybrid 3 Not ranked.

Element Choices

Some Black community members preferred Scenario 4 and 5 to maximize development potential on the covers.

Some Black community members preferred Scenario 1 to maximize the speed at which jobs are provided to the Black community by reducing schedule.

Let’s look at each element individually to see if we can find a compromise.

Image gallery contents:

Green Loop on Clackamas Crossing Bridge

Green Loop through neighborhood

Reconnect Flint and Hancock

Merge Flint and Vancouver

Rebuild ramps in existing location

Move southbound ramps

Move both ramps

Green Loop Choices

Clackamas Crossing Bridge

Green Loop on Clackamas Crossing Bridge

BUSINESS / BIKE / WALK: Walking / riding a bike over a bridge over I-5 is less pleasant

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE: No change

COST: More cost

Through Neighborhood

Green Loop through neighborhood

BUSINESS / BIKE / WALK: Walking / riding a bike through a neighborhood more pleasant; more people on foot and on bikes support businesses

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE: No change

COST: Less cost

Streets Choices

Reconnect Flint and Hancock

Reconnect Flint and Hancock

LAND: Creates more active streets for development; slightly less development land on the highway cover

TRANSIT: Neutral to transit

SCHEDULE: 6 months, EA reevaluation to replace Hancock Dixon Connection.

COST: Slightly more because it builds more streets and more cover area

Merge Flint and Vancouver

Merge Flint and Vancouver

LAND: Creates larger area for development

TRANSIT: Likely delay bus service on 4 and 44 Buses southbound

SCHEDULE: 6 months, EA reevaluation to replace Hancock Dixon Connection

COST: Slightly less because it builds less streets and less cover area

Highway Ramp Choices

Rebuild ramps as proposed in RQIP Design

Rebuild ramps in existing location

LAND: Less land; streets around new development are less pedestrian and business friendly when they hold I-5 traffic from ramps

ENVIRONMENT: Ramps are covered to reduce exposure of nearby sites to air pollution and noise

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low, likely approved with limited EA Re evaluation, least risk

Move southbound ramps
 

Move southbound ramps

LAND: Slightly more land; streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I-5 traffic

ENVIRONMENT: Moving one ramp reduces some exposure of nearby sites to air pollution and noise, other ramp can be tunneled

SCHEDULE DELAY: Low to moderate, likely 6-18 months, more complex process with slightly more risk to completion

Move southbound and northbound ramps

Move both ramps

LAND: Most land; streets around new development are more pedestrian and business friendly with less I-5 traffic; project acquires land at hotel site

ENVIRONMENT: Moving ramps reduces most exposure of nearby sites to air pollution and noise

SCHEDULE DELAY: Moderate to High, likely 6-18 months, most complex process with more risk to completion


Questions

Which approach to the Green Loop do you prefer? (Check one.)
Which approach to Streets do you prefer? (Check one.)
Which approach to ramps do you prefer? (Check one.)

Which benefits were the most important to you in choosing between elements?

(Check all that apply.)

67% Complete

Vision and Governance

The Vision that has emerged out of Work Sessions 1 and 2 provides a set of principles against which the merits of all cover scenario options can be evaluated. This framework should be the roadmap to organize the coordination of needed partnership actions and establish a governance structure that supports the community’s Vision and maximizes the benefits and restorative justice provided to the Black Historic Albina community by the Rose Quarter Improvement Project.

Image gallery contents:

Flint Looking South: Existing

Flint Looking South: Future

Proposed Cover Development Commission Formation

Cover Development Commission Roles

The Community Vision

In Work Sessions 1 and 2 participants identified priorities and developed a vision for how to achieve community Health, Wealth, Cohesion and Mobility on and around the highway cover. This vision served as the overall goal for delivering the highway cover design scenario as much as possible, so the broader Black Historic Albina Community truly benefits from this project and is provided with a sufficient quality and quantity of land to create restorative community benefits for generations to come.

We heard that the desired community programming priorities and outcomes can best be achieved when the following design objectives are applied in creating the canvas for a restored neighborhood on and around the covers:

Objectives:

  • Maximize quality, developable Land Area for community ownership and redevelopment

  • Create efficient blocks and parcels that can include a variety of buildings, civic spaces, green spaces, and provide active street frontages in the neighborhood.

  • Minimize multi-modal travel conflicts and provide safer pedestrian-oriented neighborhood streets

  • Minimize the impacts of noise and air pollution in the area

Flint Looking South to Moda Center: Existing

Flint Looking South: Existing

Flint Looking South to Moda Center: Future

Flint Looking South: Future

Click images to enlarge.

Governance

Maximizing community benefits for the Black Historic Albina community will require a governance and leadership structure that reflects the multi-faceted perspectives of the Black Historic Albina community. In addition to the technical project design and development work being done by Oregon Department of Transportation and other government agencies, the future development on the highway covers, should be stewarded by a new Black Historic Albina Cover Development Commission. This commission would have the authority to plan, monitor, manage, and oversee future development activity on the highway cover and any remnant land created by the I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project. Unlike other Oregon Department of Transportation advisory committees and boards that are currently in place, this Commission’s focus would be solely on the planning and development of the highway cover land and remnant parcels after construction of the I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project is complete.

    While such a commission should be formed by a legally binding agreement that requires the coordination and cooperation of multiple levels of government and community stakeholders, its decision-making power would sit with Black community members and representatives. In order for this Commission to be maximally effective, This entity must be:

    • led by Black community representatives
    • independent of ODOT and the Rose Quarter Improvement Project advisory committees
    • charged with creating a strategic development plan for the highway cover land and remnant parcels and overseeing future development of this land, and
    • responsible for the long-term ownership and management of development on the highway cover and remnant parcels.

    Proposed Cover Development Commission Formation

    Proposed Cover Development Commission Formation

    A cover development commission would begin working right away to support planning and decision-making about the highway covers and future development on the covers.


    Governance Roles and Responsibilities

    Cover Development Commission Roles

    Questions

    Do you agree that these are the key community objectives that need to be weighed in developing any alternative cover design scenario recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission? (Check one.)
    Do you agree with this approach to creating a new governance entity to ensure that the highway cover development meets the Black Historic Albina Community’s goals? (Check one.)
    83% Complete

    Next Steps

    Thank you for participating. Before you go, please answer a few questions about yourself and remember to submit your responses at the bottom of the page.

    Image gallery contents:

    Diagram of project area

    The highway covers can improve existing corridors and make new connections that revitalize this area of the City.

    Historic Albina Neighborhood

    Opportunity areas connected by highway covers if located the near Rose Quarter.

    Williams/Vancouver Corridor

    Opportunity areas along Williams and Vancouver that could be connected by highway covers.

    Historic Lower Albina

    Opportunity areas improved or connected by highway covers near Tubman Middle School.

    Looking Ahead

    In early June, the Independent Cover Assessment team will conduct our final Work Session 3 community workshops and abbreviated workshops with the Oregon Department of Transportation’s Historic Albina Advisory Board and Executive Steering Committee. 

    June 22, 2021 -  The Historic Albina Advisory Board will be formulating its final recommendations on the highway covers to the Executive Steering Committee at its regular meeting.

    June 28, 2021 - The Executive Steering Committee will be formulating its final highway cover design recommendation for the Oregon Transportation Commission at its regular meeting. Participate:

    July 15, 2021 - The Executive Steering Committee will present their final highway cover design recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission. Participate:

    Stay Involved

    Help the Executive Steering Committee understand how to best support your values in their recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission by providing written and/or verbal testimony at their June 28, 2021 meeting. The planning, building, and development atop the highway cover can provide broad community benefits across the entire city and region, and provide meaningful restorative justice for the Black Historic Albina community.


    Final Questions

    Tell us About You

    The following questions are optional and help the ICA public involvement team to continually aim for balanced and diverse involvement in our public processes.

    What is your race/ethnicity? (Check all that apply.)
    What is your gender? (Check one.)
    What is your age? (Check one.)
    What is your relationship to the Rose Quarter/Albina neighborhood? (Check all that apply.)
    100% Complete

    For ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) or Civil Rights Title VI accommodations, translation/ interpretation services, or more information call 503-731-4128, TTY 800-735- 2900 or Oregon Relay Service 7-1-1.

    Si desea obtener información sobre este proyecto traducida al español, sírvase llamar al 503-731-4128.

    Nếu quý vị muốn thông tin về dự án này được dịch sang tiếng Việt, xin gọi 503-731-4128.

    Если вы хотите чтобы информация об этом проекте была переведена на русский язык, пожалуйста, звоните по телефону 503-731-4128.

    如果您想瞭解這個項目,我們有提供繁體中文翻譯,請致電:503-731-4128